No Symposium Coverage Complete w/o the Tech

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

By BitcoDavid

One of the terp team at work. Photo: BitcoDavid

One of the terp team at work. Photo: BitcoDavid

True. There were 2 ASL interpreters, and what I noticed there, was that not only did they take turns interpreting for the individual speakers, but they did this cool tandem thing for audience questions. An audience member would sign her question, and Terp 1 would say it in English, then Terp 2 would sign the speaker’s answer back to the questioner.

C.A.R.T. in action. Photo: BitcoDavid

C.A.R.T. in action. Photo: BitcoDavid

C.A.R.T was also employed, and it’s the first time I have been privy to seeing C.A.R.T. in action. The operators – there were 2 of them, as well – would key in the spoken words, using a Steno machine. The output of the Steno was fed into the U.S.B. port on a laptop. The laptop drove a little DLP projector, onto a 60″ Da Lite screen. While what appeared to be the lead C.A.R.T. operator was keying in words, the backup operator would be using the Web on her own laptop, to look up words, spellings and other references.

My trusty little Sony Handicam, earning its daily bread. Photo: BitcoDavid

My trusty little Sony Handicam, earning its daily bread. Photo: BitcoDavid

On top of all that, they had a PC at the podium, and were running constant PowerPoints from the overhead DLP, onto a separate screen behind the speaker.

My little guy needs some Abilify and a hit of Viagra after seeing this monster. Photo: BitcoDavid

My little guy needs some Abilify and a hit of Viagra after seeing this monster. Photo: BitcoDavid

I wanted you to see more C.A.R.T.

The backup operator. Photo:BitcoDavid

The backup operator. Photo:BitcoDavid

All things considered, I was impressed by the accuracy and speed of C.A.R.T. As you know, captioning is something that’s important to me. The manual method I use is absolutely accurate, assuming I can hear the dialog, but it’s very slow and labor intensive. The computerized method employed by YouTube among others is horribly inaccurate – relying, as it does, on speech to text conversion. I noticed that C.A.R.T. wasn’t 100% accurate, but all things being equal it was sufficient to the task, and with almost no noticeable delay.

Here's the primary operator and her screen. at her lap level can be seen the Steno machine. Photo: BitcoDavid

Here’s the primary operator and her screen. At her lap level can be seen the Steno machine. Photo: BitcoDavid

BitcoDavid is a blogger and a blog site consultant. In former lives, he was an audio engineer, a videographer, a teacher – even a cab driver. He is an avid health and fitness enthusiast and a Pro/Am boxer. He has spent years working with diet and exercise to combat obesity and obesity related illness.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

Comments (3)

  1. celticautumn

    So here’s the thing about CART: it is as good as the “library” in the stenotype machine. dollars will get you donuts that these were medical CART libraries being used. Have been at a deposition where the CART was not nearly as accurate due to the lack of libraries. Hey this is a stenotype machine it uses phonetics, I believe, in order to transcribe the words.

    CART is remarkable AND if the request had been made ahead it could have been arranged for a print out of everything said there. THAT would have been phenomenal!

    However, much as I like CART, it is sterile compared to a good Terp. My favorite is a guy named Justin. He is REMARKABLE! The Deaf often say the hearing are deaf from the neck down. Justin is one if the most fully alive terps out there, especially for late deafened adults (LDAs).

    Loved the symposium. Need a paper to present next year and it will be two days long.

    • Very interesting info about C.A.R.T. I hope we can meet at next years, and who knows – maybe I’ll be presenting too. 🙂

  2. Pingback: H.E.A.R.D. Public Meeting Event Next Week | deafinprison

Comments are closed.